Wednesday, May 22, 2024


Were you or a loved one hurt due to someone else’s negligence, recklessness, or harmful behavior? If that’s the case, you might be able to file a personal injury lawsuit for financial compensation. You must show causation between your injuries and the defendant’s negligence in California to win a personal injury lawsuit.

In California, a defendant is only liable for injuries if their carelessness played a “substantial factor” in bringing about the incident. Here, Stockton personal injury attorney, California, breaks down the essentials of establishing negligence in a California accident case.

  • Establishing Causation Is Essential In Personal Injury Cases

To hold the defendant legally responsible for an accident, the victim must demonstrate that the defendant was negligent or that the accident was “caused” by the defendant’s negligence. To claim for personal injury in California, it is necessary to demonstrate that this occurred. In California, a defendant cannot be held accountable for damages unless evidence shows they were at fault.

Let’s imagine you were involved in a car accident in the middle of Stockton, and it caused you some injuries. Because they disregarded a stop sign, the other drivers are unquestionably to blame for the collision. Ignoring a stop sign is considered careless behavior in the state of California. If, on the other hand, the stop sign had been run three blocks away and one minute before your collision, there is a good chance that it would not be an issue in your case since it would still be negligence, but it would not be directly tied to the accident.


In cases involving personal injuries, the concept of causality is frequently ambiguous. The causes of major accidents are typically complex and intertwined with one another. It is not always easy to determine the legal reason (also known as the proximate cause). A friend phoning you for a ride and you get into an accident has a weak connection to each other as potential causes of the other. But that doesn’t make it a valid excuse in court. It makes no difference; from a legal standpoint, it makes no difference why the collision occurred for whatever reason.

For an act or omission to be considered a “substantial factor” and thus a legal cause for a personal injuries claim, it must be proven that the act or omission was intentional. This is because the Judicial Commission of State Civil Jury Instructions states that for an act or omission to be considered a “substantial factor,” it must be proven that the act or omission was intentional.

The state’s jury instruction defines a “substantial factor” as “a factor that a sensible person would consider to have related to the harm.” The phrase “a factor that a sensible person would regard to have related to the harm” The relationship must be more than merely remote or inconsequential to prove guilt, even though it may not be the only factor to show responsibility.


Personal injury attorneys at Law Corp are known for being trustworthy and effective advocates for their clients. This business successfully recuperates more than $25.0 million for the benefit of victims and the families of those harmed.

Suppose you require assistance deciding who was at fault in an accident. In that case, you should contact an attorney as soon as possible, either by calling them or finding their contact information online. You can anticipate complete discretion and the absence of out-of-pocket costs during the first consultation they have with you. They offer their assistance to persons who have been injured around the county as well as the entirety of Central California when they perform their services.